FirstPreviousHomeNext

The League of Nations

Organisation, Membership and Powers

   

The League had no means of enforcing its decisions other than the effect of world opinion.
If a power chose to be defiant, there was nothing effective that the League could do

S Reed Brett, European History 1900-1960 (1967).

 

One basic weakness of the League was that it was tied in people's minds to the Versailles settlement, and criticism thrown at Versailles fell on the League.  The refusal of the USA to join the League and the fact that Britain and France were the only major nations of Europe who remained full members, severely handicapped its efforts.

Written by PJ Larkin, European History for Certificate Classes (1965).
PJ Larkin was a teacher of secondary school pupils, and this is a revision book.

 

 

Strengths and Weaknesses

The main strength of the League was that it had been set up by the Treaty of Versailles, and agreed by everybody at the conference.  When, later, many people started to criticise and attack the Treaty, this was also a major weakness. 

  

Going Deeper

The following links will help you widen your knowledge:

The Court of International Justice - in more detail.

The International Labour Organisation - in more detail. 

How did the League's membership affect its strength - in more detail.

- Giles Hill on the establishment of the League

 

  Simple Essay: Describe the organisation of the League of Nations.

  Simple Essay: What were the strengths and weaknesses of the League of Nations in the 1920s?

 

 

1.  Organisation

One of the biggest weaknesses was that the Organisation of the League was a muddle
The different parts of the League were supposed to act together; but in a crisis, no-one could agree.

The main elements of the League's structure were:

   

ASSEMBLY

The League’s main meeting, held once a year.
All League nations could attend.
Decisions only by unanimous vote.

COUNCIL

Met 4-5 times a year and in crises to solve international disputes.
5 permanent members (Br, Fr, It, Jap & Ger after 1926)
Permanent members had a veto.

CONFERENCE OF AMBASSADORS

Informal meetings of the more important countries.
Not part of the League, but often made decisions

  

SECRETARIAT

... was supposed to organise the League.

  

AGENCIES AND COMMISSIONS

COURT OF INTERNATIONAL JUSTICE

15 judges meeting at the Hague in the Netherlands.
Gave decisions on, e.g., fishing and shipping disputes.
Only made decisions when asked.  Had no power to enforce decisions.

 

OTHER COMMISSIONS

Economic & Financial; Opium; Intellectual Cooperation, Communication & Transit, Traffic in Women & Children.

 

 

INTERNATIONAL LABOUR ORGANISATION

Met once a year. Invited government, employers and workers representatives to improve working conditions

 

MANDATES COMMISSION

Made sure that League countries were ruling the mandates properly. 

Administered League-controlled areas such as the Saar and Danzig.

 

 

HEALTH ORGANISATION

To improve public health world-wide.

 

REFUGEES COMMISSION

To help refugees and disaster victims.

 

SLAVERY COMMISSION

To abolish slavery.

   

 

2.  How the League kept peace

The League hoped that it could influence countries to 'do the right thing' by:

   •  Collective Security - the countries of the League agreeing, together, to defend each other

   •  Community of Power - the League acting, togther, to enforce its principles

   •  Moral Persuasion - the 'moral power' of the League lay in the League's Covenant, especially Articles 10-17, in which members promised to keep the peace; the belief that no nation wants the collective international disapproval of other nations.  Many writers have pointed out that this is not an effective deterrent against a powerful country which was determined to disobey the League.

       

If these moral influences failed, the League had THREE POWERS it could use to make countries do as it wanted:

   1.  Condemnation (the League could tell a country it was doing wrong).

   2.  Arbitration (the League could offer to decide between two countries).

   3.  Sanctions (stopping trade).

Theoretically, the League was able to use military force, but the League did not have an army of its own – so if a country ignored it, in the end, there was nothing the League could do..

   

3.  Membership

Forty-two countries joined the League at the start.  In the 1930s about 60 countries were members .  This made the League seem strong.

Britain and France were the main members, helped by Italy and Japan; they were quite powerful countries.

A critical weakness was that the most powerful countries in the world were not members The USA did not want to join (see below)  The Russians refused to join – they were Communists and hated Britain and France.  Germany was not allowed to join.  Without these three big powers, the League was weak.

    

 

Source A

If any member of the League goes to war, all the other members will behave as if that member country had declared war on them.  They will stop trading with that country.  They will advise the Council of the League about any armed action that should be taken.

adapted from the Covenant of the League of Nations (1919).

 

  Source B

Powerpoint presentation explaining the cartoon

‘Moral Persuasion'– a Punch cartoon of 1920.
The rabbit is saying: "My offensive equipment being practically nil, it remains for me to fascinate him with the power of my eye."

Click here for the interpretation

America Pulls Out

Perhaps the greatest weakness of the League was that, when Wilson got back home to the United States, the American Senate refused to join the League.

Americans did not want to get dragged into other countries’ problems.

This damaged the League a lot.  It did not have access to the prestige, influence, wealth or military power of the United States.  It was forced to rely on Britain and France, who had both been weakened by the First World War.

 

   

Timeline

Should America join the League? - a brilliant explanation by Ben Walsh of why America refused to join.

Sources on why America refused to join

Speeches by American politicians

Powerpoint presentation explaining the cartoon

 

◄  Source C

‘The Gap in the Bridge’ – a cartoon of 1919 by Leonard Ravenhill in the British magazine Punch.
This cartoon is critical of America.  Although President Wilson had been the originator the the idea of a League (see the sign), now - although the USA is the 'keystone' (essential to stop the League collapsing) - America (represened by the sleeping figure of 'Uncle Sam') is refusing to join..

Click here for the interpretation

 

Consider:

1.  Did the artist of Source B think the League of Nations was powerful?

2.  Did the League of Nations have any chance of success?

 

  • AQA-style Questions

      3.  Write an account of the organisation of the League of Nations.

      4.  "The League was dead in the water from the moment it met – it just didn't realise it."  How far do you agree with this statement?

 

  • OCR-style Questions

      1.  Outline how international peace was encouraged in the 1920s.

      2.  Explain why the League of Nations was a weak organisation.

  


FirstPreviousHomeNext